Space Antrim Two Wins £300K in Landmark Libel Box Against Tattle Life Website
- Update Time : 05:49:01 am, Saturday, 14 June 2025
- / 30
In a landmark lbad win, Neil , and Donna Sands, a two from Space Antrim, own was awarded £300,0 in damages later beating a defamation , and harassment lawsuit against the argued around gossip website, Tattle Life; But the box, which lasted above two years, not just came from in a matters payout for the Sands but too displayed the identities back the website , and sparked a wider speak around online harassment , and defamation.
What’s Tattle Life?
Tattle Life is an online forum the one allows users to mail comments around various public figures, influencers, celebrities, and now , and next, normal persons; But what was in first pitched like a place for talkings , and “fair remarks” quick path got notoriety for hosting hurting , and hurting happy. But thing became a platform where users couldn’t known path rip not together the reputations of them. Was a lot of of times public figures or people media influencers. While the place’s owners spoke to own strict rules against hurting happy, a lot of felt thing had become a raising earth for online harassment , and defamation.
The place, which boasts millions of visitors each month, got focus for being one of the most broadly-read forums where users can discuss , and critique anyone, a lot of of times crossing inside harassment. Also, the Sands two was between the a lot of victims of here toxic around you.
You can also know
The Lbad Box , and the Fight for Fairness
Neil Sands, a 43-year-old science tools entrepreneur, and his 34-year-old wife Donna. Runs a path work, sued Tattle Life in Month 2 2021 later being targeted near mean posts; But the posts, which was filled with defamatory comments , and harassment, painted an not right , and untrue picture of the two, harming their work , and private lives. But the Sands two was not just subjected to pain but too felt their alone was invaded , and their data rights breached.
The Sands didn’t back down , and fought relentlessly for fairness, flat though the lbad fight got a heavy toll on them. Also, in Month 12 2023, a Belfast High Court ruling awarded the two £150,0 each in damages beside with lbad costs. Also, the court found the one the website was on why path put up to cause hurt , and problem to its targets; But thing too written the one the website let not known users to “trash” the reputations of persons without consequences.
Neil , and Donna Sands’ win was from past, signing one of the biggest defamation payouts in From north Ireland. Also, the two’s win too sent an easy to get message around the dangers of online harassment , and the consequences the one them in price for such actions can front.
Who Was Back Tattle Life?
For years, the worker of Tattle Life stayed not known. But, while the lbad proceedings, a worldwide forensic seeing inside led near the Sands displayed the. Also, you are of the website’s worker. The person back Tattle Life turned out to be Sebastian Bond, an UK nation. Also, too did work a plant-built on recipe blog below the name Bastian Durward (Nest & Glow). Bond, who once had a matters going; But online, was displayed not just for doing work the place but too for being included in what the court said around like “peddling untruths for profit.”.
Bond, beside with his two marked up companies, Yuzu Zest Bounded , and Kumquat Tree Bounded, was called in the lawsuit. Investigators traced the owning of the place. Also, the judge ruled the one Bond , and his companies was in price for running the place , and helping the online pain.
The Effect of the Box on Online Harassment
Speaking outside the court, Neil Sands stressed the one here box was not just around seeking paying back but too around carrying knowing to the broader issue of online harassment; But male said why the one they got the box not just for they near self but too on for of others. But own felt hurt same path from the harming effects of not known online attacks; But “Us think real in free speech, but not outcome-free speech,” Neil spoke. “Especially when thing is did pain persons’s lives, businesses, and mind health.”
The lbad fight , and its outcome own made open up a lots-must had speak around the boundaries of free speech online; But while part persons might argue the one websites like Tattle Life give a platform for “free saying,” the box highlighted the dangers of letting unmoderated not known posts to defame , and pain individuals. But the Sands’ win displayed the one anonymity on the internet does not give holding safe from the consequences of illegal doing, owning in defamation , and harassment.
The Worldwide Try to Show the Defendants
To uncover the truth, the Sands , and their lbad group pursued a worldwide forensic seeing inside to path down the website’s operators. Also, the seeing inside spanned above a lot of countries, owning in the UK , and Hong Kong. Also, It was a hard try the one included using in front machine proof , and lbad techniques to name Bond , and his companies. Also, the Sands’ lbad group, led near solicitor Peter Barr, had to move the more mile to show what they shouted a “hard try to avoid scrusmall.”
The seeing inside displayed the one Bond had left to great lengths to hide his; But you are, using not same aliases , and doing work companies in various locations. Also, but, later years of lbad work, the Sands was can do to bring the in price parties to fairness.
The Message Back the Lbad win
The ruling owns sent an easy to get message to them included in online harassment: the internet is not an not known place where you can hurt others without outcome. Also, like more persons front online harassment , and defamation, the box against Tattle Life provides an matters precedent; But thing signals the one the courts are ready to keep individuals does what should do for the hurt they cause through not known online doing.
The Sands two spoke want the one their win might help others. Own was targeted near online pain to come in front; But they stressed the one while they was lucky enough to get on here lbad fight, It was an costly , and when-using up try. Also, but, they stay wishing the one their actions will inspire others to get doing , and fight back against online harassment.
Ending
The lbad box involving Neil , and Donna Sands , and Tattle Life is a groundbreaking sample of how victims of online harassment can seek fairness; But with a £300,0 payout , and the displaying of the website’s worker, the box owns put a new normal for how such cases can be held in the future. But like the machine earth continues to change, the importance of holding individuals does what should do for online actions can’t be overstated. Also, the Sands’ win serves like a reminder the one us all earn to live free from online hate , and harassment, and the one actions got in the machine earth own real-earth consequences.
